National Security Agency officials often reference the 9/11 terrorist attacks when justifying the agency's mass surveillance program that was leaked to the public last June; and, not surprisingly, this type of language appears to be intentional.
Under the Freedom of Information Act, Al Jazeera America was able to get its hands on insider NSA documents (PDF) that outline talking points for how officials should respond to spying allegations. These documents are peppered with statements that appear to invoke the September 11, 2001, attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon.
Here are a few of the suggested responses listed in the documents:
- I much prefer to be here today explaining these programs, than explaining another 9/11 event that we were not able to prevent.
- NSA and its partners must make sure we connect the dots so that the nation is never attacked again like it was on 9/11.
- First responsibility is to defend the nation.
- Post-9/11 we made several changes and added a number of capabilities to enable us to connect the dots.
- NSA is committed to protecting the privacy and civil liberties of the American people.
At one point during the hearing, Alexander even referenced how many people were killed in the attack. "How did we end up here? 9/11 -- 2,996 people were killed in 9/11."
That document leak opened the public's eyes to the government's collection of data on US residents through both cellular records and metadata from Internet companies. Since Snowden's original leak, thousands more documents have surfaced.
The NSA and the Obama administration have maintained that the surveillance program was carried out to protect Americans and track down foreign terrorists and pinpoint terrorist threats.
No comments:
Post a Comment