Friday, 22 November 2013

Verizon Wireless offers $5-a-day data for tablets

Company announces new data plan, which comes with 300MB of data capacity, for tablet and connected-device owners who want occasional access to Verizon's 4G LTE network.

Tablets are expected to be one of the hottest gadget gift items for Holiday 2013. And Verizon Wireless has a new daily data plan that will get customers hooked up to the company's 4G LTE network for $5 a day.
 
(Credit: Verizon Wireless) 
 
On Thursday, Verizon Wireless announced the introduction of a new $5-a-day data plan for customers with tablets and other Internet connected devices, such as the Samsung Galaxy camera. The new plan will let users connect to Verizon's 4G LTE data network for 24 hours with access to up to 300 megabytes worth of data.
Customers who sign up will not be charged an activation fee. And if 300MB worth of data isn't enough, customers will get an alert to allow them to purchase another 300MB worth of data for $5. It's also easy to reactivate the service after a session has expired. Customers can simply go back to their account online after their daily session has expired to sign up again.
The way it works for customers who already have a Verizon Wireless SIM card installed in their tablet or device is that when they launch their browser, they'll automatically be routed to the Verizon Wireless broadband portal. Once on this landing page, they can choose a Share Everything plan, which lets customers share data among smartphones and other devices, including tablets, and requires a monthly contract. Prepay options will also be available, including the new $5 daily plan. Customers who don't have a Verizon Wireless SIM card installed in their device will have to stop by a Verizon Wireless retail location to get one. And a representative will be able to help them activate a data plan of their choosing.
Verizon has already been offering prepaid data plans for tablets and other connected devices. But these options offer service for 30 days, and the cost is considerably more. The cheapest option for a monthly prepaid data plan is $20 for 1GB of data, which can be used for up to a month. The plan is designed so that the service will automatically renew at the end of the 30-day period and the customer's credit card is automatically charged, making it a better option for people who need access to Verizon's data network on a more regular basis.
The new $5 daily service plan is not designed for customers who want access to Verizon's data network all the time. Instead, it's intended for customers who may need LTE services only occasionally, when Wi-Fi service is not available. It may also appeal to customers who don't want to pay for daily access to a Wi-Fi network in locations such as hotels.
Verizon is not the only wireless operator going after these occasional data users. In October AT&T announced a similar plan, which also costs $5 a day. AT&T's plan offers only 250MB of data per day.

Here's how Walmart will fight off Amazon on Black Friday

 
Walmart is shooting for a huge Black Friday weekend. 

Walmart is going all out to ensure it is the destination for this year's holiday shopping season -- whether that may be its physical or virtual store.
Late Thursday, it unveiled a dizzying array of promotions, from a lower minimum purchase to qualify for free shipping to select Black Friday doorbuster promotions -- available online ahead Thanksgiving morning. Cyber Monday -- which Walmart will naturally be starting on Saturday -- is extended to an entire week.
Its emphasis to bolster both its online and in-store promotions comes as the retailing industry deals with the impact of online giant Amazon, which has largely eaten the lunch of the traditional brick-and-mortar players. Once staid stores such as Borders and Circuit City have already shuttered, while Walmart and others have reported falling sales and profits.

Walmart, for its part, said the decisions it has made are based on its customers. In fact, Joel Anderson, CEO of Walmart.com US, spent more than 30 minutes talking about the promotions without once mentioning Amazon, even if there were hints of the online retailer in his comments.
"We follow our own playbook, which is unique," Anderson said on a conference call with reporters.
Retailers have traditionally eyed the critical Black Friday period -- which now stretches from Thanksgiving to well beyond the following Cyber Monday -- as a major source of their sales of the year. But the online component is expected to be even more vital this year, especially as traditional retailers try to go toe-to-toe with Amazon online.
In a survey held by Nielsen, 46 percent of consumers said they would shop online on Cyber Monday, up from 30 percent a year ago. In comparison, only 13 percent of respondents said they would shop at physical stores on Black Friday, down from 17 percent in 2012.
Anderson said last year's Cyber Monday was the highest grossing day online in the company's history.
Starting Friday, Walmart online customers only need to order $35 worth of goods on nearly any item to qualify for free shipping. That's the same minimum level at Amazon, which the online retailer raised by $10 in October.
Anderson denied there was any link between its new offer and Amazon's policy.
"Customers have told us shipping cost is very important in their decision," he said.
Shoppers can also upgrade to three-to-five-day shipping for $2.97, Anderson said, adding the point that no subscription fee is required -- which could be interpreted as a veiled reference to Amazon's subscription-based Prime program.
Walmart will also match the prices of competitors such as Target and Best Buy, but the company didn't mentioned Amazon.
Several Black Friday deals slated to be found in stores on Thanksgiving evening will be available on Walmart.com that morning, although Anderson warned there would be limited quantities. The decision to add the online component was to create "anytime, anywhere access" to Walmart, and dismissed concerns that the online deals would draw people away from the physical stores.
 
 
Walmart.com, meanwhile, is making its big online push starting Saturday, attempting to rebrand Cyber Monday into Cyber Week, which stretches to the following Friday.
Anderson said he opted to kick off Cyber Monday on Saturday because he saw consumer traffic to the Web site spiked that day. To better take advantage of the interest, he opted to kick things off two days in advance.
He promised a large assortment of online deals -- including one-time offers and specials -- as Cyber Week rolls along. Consumers will also be able to order online and pick it up at a nearby store.
Consumers are expected to fork over some big bucks this year. Nearly a third of consumers from all income ranges surveyed by Nielsen say the will spend between $250 and $500 this season, with 20 percent spending $500 to $1,000.
Walmart is hoping a larger share of those dollars end up heading in its direction.

Google's insanely playful, Dalektable Doctor Who doodle


Be their assistant.
Google decides to make its latest doodle perhaps its most marvelous yet. It's an 8-bit Doctor Who game that celebrates all the different Doctors. Because it's the 50th anniversary of the Timelord, right?

When you go to the Google home page on Friday, you might think you have a medical problem.
The page, you see, won't stop moving. It seems as if there are vast numbers of strangely dressed men performing the Riverdance.

Actually, this is the Whodle. Or at least this is what it's been known as during its four-month development.
In order to commemorate the Timelord's 50th anniversary, Google's doodlers have created an interactive spectacle featuring all 11 Doctors. They have stopped at nothing to ensure that this 8-bit multilevel platform game is a masterpiece of interactive theater.
In an attempt at sublime authenticity, Google put a Brit, Matthew Cruickshank, in charge. He explained to the Guardian: "They thought 'Oh, Matt is English, so he should do the doodle.' It was a bit of pressure!"
As you play, you'll realize just how intricately designed this whole thing is. There's the real whoosh from the Tardis. There are Daleks and Cybermen, of course. But, most of all, there are different levels reflecting different eras of the show.
Your mission, should you choose to accept it (and it's Friday, so why shouldn't you?), is to rescue the six letters of the Google name from the nefarious enemies.
I have a feeling that IT departments, developers, and, well most of the tech world, will stop and pay playful home for a whole day on Friday.


Wednesday, 20 November 2013

Google Translate for Android gets conversational

 
 
Google's new conversation voice translator.
 
 
Google announced an update on Wednesday for its Translate app for Android that promises faster speech translation, support for more languages, and an updated user interface.
Perhaps the most attractive portion of the update is the ability for people who speak different languages to have a real-time translated conversation. The translation process involves touching the app's microphone and rotating the screen to switch between the languages.

A Google demonstration of the new feature in action:

The update adds support for Hebrew, Javanese, and Esperanto to the app's handwriting feature, allowing users to write a word or character they don't understand on the screen of their smartphone or tablet for immediate translation.
Language support for Malay and Ukranian have been added to the app's camera translation feature, which allows users to translate text using only their device's camera lens. Employing Google Goggles' optical character recognition (OCR) technology, the app translates words or characters captured in images with a brush of the text.
Google also touts the app's new "sleek" user interface. The company said it's rolling out the update to the Google Play store on Wednesday and Thursday.

Next Microsoft CEO: After Thanksgiving, before Christmas?

Getty Images
Ford CEO Alan Mulally, reportedly the top candidate to be Microsoft's next CEO. 

The absence of news about Steve Ballmer's replacement continues but perhaps not much longer. For the rank-and-file, the word can't come soon enough.After Thanksgiving, before Christmas?
Wishful thinking or not, that's the water cooler talk inside Microsoft. The company's rank and file expect to learn of Steve Ballmer's replacement between the two big end-of-year holidays, said a source in a position to know. There's a measure of urgency for Microsoft's board of directors to make known its choice soon. Ballmer revealed in late August that he planned to step down as chief executive sometime within the subsequent 12 months and the resulting information vacuum during the interregnum has begun to manifest itself in troubling ways.
"Within the enterprise sales group there's a sense that we're not going to make any bold investments until there's a decision about Steve's successor," said the source.
That doesn't mean people are playing Parcheesi until 2 before lighting out for the golf course. But the source talked about what could best be described as a sense of suspended animation setting in among some employees and managers as they wait to learn about the new boss's strategy.
A spokesman said that the company had no comment on the CEO search. The board of directors may be vetting a dark horse candidate but the leading roster of candidates is so far said to include Ford's Alan Mulally, Nokia's Stephen Elop, Microsoft business development head, Tony Bates, and former Microsoft exec Paul Maritz. John Thompson, the highly-regarded former Symantec CEO who heads the board committee searching for a Ballmer replacement, early on took himself out of the running.
Meanwhile, the internal guessing game continues. During the company's annual shareholder's meeting on Wednesday, Bill Gates acknowledged that the board has met with "a lot" of CEO candidates so far without naming names.
The internal scuttlebutt at Microsoft is that the job remains Mulally's, if he wants it.

Nokia Lumia 2520 declassified: Inside the punishing development of a new tablet

 
Nokia sat on the sidelines of the tablet race for years, but it's finally entering the game with the new 2520. This is the story of how that tablet came to be, and of how Nokia hopes to build many more.

It could be said that Nokia is late to the market with the Lumia 2520, a 10-inch tablet running Windows RT that launches in the US on Wednesday. But dig a little deeper and you'll find that the $500 slate is something of a return to a form.
By today's definition, 2005's Nokia 770 Internet Tablet, with its 4.1-inch WVGA display, would rank as a low-end smartphone -- minus the phone bit. Lacking cellular connectivity, it connected over Wi-Fi or, if you were lucky, tethered to something with a cellular connection over Bluetooth. It was a compelling little device that didn't exactly light the world on fire.
If we move ahead to 2008's N810 WiMAX Edition we find a closer relative to the new 2520 slate, pausing to quietly mourn the silent death of 2011's promising MeeGo tablet before returning to the present.
Today, it's easy to call all those Internet Tablets irrelevant -- too far removed to matter in this rapidly evolving world of consumer technology. But then Nokia isn't your typical consumer-technology company, famously dating back to the mid-19th century. Its lineage may have made Nokia a bit more conservative than the competition, but possibly wiser, and so less likely to dive into an ultra-competitive market without a very clear goal.
"A product needs to know what it wants to be... Just because you can do something doesn't mean that you should rush to do it."
Heikki Norta
 
 
That's Heikki Norta's explanation of why it's taken Nokia this long to tap into the now-lucrative tablet market. Norta, an intense but easily likeable man with cropped hair, wire-rimmed glasses, and a rapid-fire Finnish accent, has 22 years experience, an entire career spent at Nokia. He's now a vice president and general manager of the company's Connected Devices division.
Norta moved from Finland to San Diego expressly to get the 2520 off the ground. Tablets, says Norta, require an intimate blend of hardware and software. If either side is lacking the whole thing fails, and without talented resources driving both sides your product will suffer. "There are few places in the world that you can attract and keep talent in both," he says.
San Diego is one of those places. "From a partner standpoint, we made the decision we were going to be on Windows, so having time zone proximity with the team in Redmond was helpful, and equally so with Qualcomm." Qualcomm provides the Snapdragon 800 chipset and integrated modem that form the core of the 2520 tablet. Its offices are a scenic 15 minute drive away.

San Diego

 
 
Nokia's presence in San Diego is far from new, having set up shop years ago, but the office got a major boost in late 2011 as the 2520 project kicked off. The team would ultimately expand to a second building and fill it with testing equipment and talented people. How do you hire for a project that doesn't exist? Norta pulled up one of the job postings, dated March 15, 2012, and read it aloud:
"Connected devices: a team that will help Nokia address new opportunities in adjacent categories to mobile devices. The team will define what's next for Nokia in our aim to deliver great mobile products and experiences and what kind of new, unique, and differentiated product experiences we come up with to delight consumers."
"We wanted to make sure that we didn't build a pirate ship inside the company, because the company knows what it's doing."
He couldn't help but laugh at the vagueness of the thing. "Would you join that?" Plenty did, but Nokia wasn't just looking outside the company to staff up for this tablet effort. "We wanted to make sure that we didn't build a pirate ship inside the company, because the company knows what it's doing." That's an interesting contrast to Microsoft's Surface design team, which one designer described as exactly that: a pirate ship, internal yet largely independent from the greater corporate ways.
Nokia needed its expertise to make this product work because it isn't just a typical Wi-Fi-enabled tablet that will spend its days idly serving up eBay auctions and Pinterest boards from close proximity to the couch. The 2520, you see, is a mobile tablet exclusively available with LTE, and while that may seem like a minor distinction, that concept of mobility justifies its very existence.

A tablet to take with you

 
 
Norta draws a curve on a whiteboard, a curve with one hump at the left and a second over on the right. On the X-axis, moving left to right, is time of day. The Y-axis, meanwhile, represents the frequency of tablet usage. According to Nokia's research, users pick up their tablets in the morning to check in on e-mail and the social networks, then set them down until they get home from work. Usage then spikes again for a few hours in the evening, and that's it. Nokia designed the Lumia 2520 specifically to fill in those gaps.
"We spent a tremendous amount of time focusing on the consumer. Consumers were in love with their tablets...but they were itching to do more." Norta points at the curving line on the whiteboard: "We wanted to make the camel-like curve look more like a stallion!"
"This is the tablet made for mobility from the company that created mobile."
"This is the tablet made for mobility from the company that created mobile." That became a sort of unofficial mantra of the device according to Paul Bischoff, product manager at Nokia. This would be a tablet designed to go with you, an objective that surely inspired one of the project's multiple code names: Sirius, Orion's faithful dog that followed him to the stars. To deliver on that promise, Nokia had to create a device with great battery life, quick charging, an outdoor-compatible display, a comfortable organic shape, and, of course, high-speed connectivity wherever you go.


That last part is where the team, and Bischoff in particular, would be able to tap in to Nokia's mobile expertise. "This category with the operator channel is not as mature as it is with the retail channel." Translation: the carriers don't really know how to sell tablets, which is why many of their previous efforts have failed. (Remember the Xoom?) That becomes doubly problematic when you try to get those carriers to sell devices running a PC operating system like Windows RT. "The operator world is still phone centric...They have total control over that experience. That control is lost in the PC domain."
This is a situation that anyone who's been waiting for months for an Android update knows too well: without hacking, the phone likely isn't getting revised until the carrier says so. Imagine having to wait for Verizon or AT&T to certify and approve every driver version and browser update on your PC. It would never fly, and Nokia worked hard to get the carriers to compromise. "They've lost a tremendous amount of control in what they're approving, what they're testing, what their philosophy of what device certification means. That's been a big challenge for us."

The brutal side of mobility

 
 
If a product is to be truly mobile, to leave the safe confines of the living room, it must be ready for the challenges that lie ahead. These include such things as sun-tan lotion, dust, rain, and gravity. Gravity alone poses quite a challenge. Karthik Govindhasamy, head of engineering for the Connected Devices division, says that the question wasn't so much whether you could drop the 2520, but how far could you drop it. A design goal was to "be able to drop on all four corners without breaking the glass."
Drop testing is something Nokia's designers are already intimately familiar with, but moving up to a far-heavier 10-inch device poses a new suite of challenges, and thus, a new suite of tests. Nokia already had a series of comprehensive gadget torture chambers in San Diego, equipped with enough nefarious tools to make a Spanish inquisitor blush as red as his robes. In one room, a line of robotic arms tap, prod, plug, and unplug test devices thousands and thousands of times to ensure basic longevity. The devices are also subjected to chemical abuse, smeared with Crisco and foundation to see what stains and what washes off.
Next door, things get a little more intense. Here, a row of tumblers cause phones and tablets to fall one meter before carrying them up to the top and dropping them again. Nokia has vibrating chambers full of dust; a precisely calibrated rain simulator; a 50 degree Celsius "damp heat" chamber; presses that twist and squash tablets; and a fully configurable, remotely controlled drop chamber that lets you release any device from any angle and any height.
Yes, I broke a priceless 2520 prototype, but this one had obviously survived weeks of hell long before I came along and put it out of its misery.
I was given the opportunity to do just that, dropping a black 2520 from a height of about four feet onto its corner. The rig holds the tablet in place by suction cups and then, with the squeeze of a trigger, releases it into the incompetent hands of our gravitational field. The tablet, already battle-scarred from countless drops and tests before, landed with a solid thud. Its screen stayed intact and the case looked no worse, but the display now showed only a series of lines. Yes, I broke a priceless 2520 prototype, but this one had obviously survived weeks of hell long before I came along and put it out of its misery.

A dead Lumia 2520

It may be the last tablet to be destroyed in Nokia's torture chamber, but it certainly wasn't the first. The teams, here and in the Quality Automation Lab upstairs (where a suite of custom, automated tests verify software functionality), often worked multiple shifts around the clock, testing chassis and component iterations until everything met Nokia's durability constraints. This included the eventual addition of a series of shock-absorbing "crush zones" built into the corners, one of hundreds of chassis iterations conceived by the design team led by Principle Designer Boris Landwehr.
The design of the 2520 is, of course, largely derivative of the Lumia smartphones that came before, offering the same basic shape and polycarbonate feel. Still, Landwehr (who previously worked on the X7, Lumia 900, and Lumia 822), says the team struggled with reformulating plastic resins and crafting new molding processes to support this much larger polycarbonate unibody. Getting big, flat sheets of plastic to come out of a mold while maintaining tolerances of a fraction of a millimeter is, as it turns, out, a challenging thing.
 

Uniquely differentiated?

 
 
While the tablet market isn't as oversaturated as the smartphone market has become, it's rapidly approaching parity, and yet only Apple and Samsung have really shown proper success when it comes to sales. Even Microsoft, with a massive marketing budget and retail partners, has struggled to establish momentum for the Surface line.
Will the Nokia Lumia 2520's focus on mobility really help it stand apart from the teeming Android and iOS masses? Perhaps more importantly, how will it avoid being compared to the Surface 2? Aesthetically the two are miles apart, but intrinsically both are 10-inch devices running Windows RT 8.1 hitting the market with similar prices: $450 for the 32GB Surface, $500 for the 2520, though Verizon will take $100 off for those who don't mind two years of indentured servitude. That they both offer a battery-packing keyboard case that attaches by magnets only invites more comparison. (That said, it's actually difficult to compare the two cases, as the typing experience on Microsoft's is miles better.)
Nokia has bet big on this device's success. It poured more than $7 million into outfitting its second San Diego location with test equipment and numerous massive, fully insulated anechoic chambers specifically designed for testing tablets. The 2520 was the first to run that full-spectrum gauntlet, but it was never intended to be the only one. If Heikki Norta gets his way, and if his future overlords at Microsoft allow it, this will not be the last tablet launched by Nokia. This will become a family of devices in multiple sizes, devices offering portability and productivity, all very clearly and very proudly made by the company that created mobile.

How to delete and pause your YouTube watch history

Google tracks the videos you watch to provide a handy list so you can return to videos you enjoyed previously. Learn how to delete your history and prevent it from continuing to track your viewing habits

It seems that with its recent Google+ update, YouTube has taken its finger off of the pause button on your watch history. YouTube tracks the videos you watch, providing a convenient list should you want to return to a video you vaguely recall watching in the past. If you had this feature paused before YouTube's update this month, your watch history is once again rolling.
Your watch history is viewable only from your account, but that doesn't mean a friend using your computer couldn't accidentally discover your LOLcats obsession. Thus, now is a good time to review your watch history management options.

 
 
To view your YouTube watch history, click on the History link in the upper-left menu. You can delete your entire history by clicking the Clear all watch history button at the top of the list. And you can stop YouTube from adding to the list by clicking Pause watch history. You can also remove particularly embarrassing videos by selecting the check boxes next to them, and then clicking Remove.
Meanwhile, if you are not happy with Google's change to YouTube's comment system, there are ways to combat it.

BMW i3 declassified: Why the Bavarian Motor Works' little EV has big potential



When young, nimble companies displace established, stalwart ones, it forces everyone to keep on their toes. Disruption has pushed the consumer tech world to insane levels of churn, but even the humble automobile is not immune. Tesla is the poster child for vehicular disruption, a new brand launching a new luxury automobile that, within a few months, was outselling popular models from Lexus, Porsche, and even BMW. Others are coming, with their own alternative cars and motorcycles, all intent on knocking the now-familiar brands from their comfortable perches.
Keenly aware of its position in the crosshairs, the Bavarian Motor Works decided to disrupt itself. Thus was born Project i and the i3, the first fruit plucked from that young tree. It's BMW's first full-production, full-electric vehicle, following in the treadmarks established by the Active e and Mini e prototypes that came before. It is a city car, short and narrow yet tall, a boxlike shape that affords a surprising amount of interior room within diminutive dimensions. Its 18.8kWh battery park, mounted in the floor for a lower center of gravity, offers a maximum of 118-mile range, powering a rear-mounted 168 hp engine. It's surprisingly quick, surprisingly fun to drive, and has more and better high-tech appointments than any other EV on the road -- even Tesla's Model S.


However, priced at $45,300 when it hits US dealers in early 2014, it's not for everybody. It's made of premium materials throughout, starting with a chassis that's largely woven of carbon fiber reinforced plastic, or CFRP. The i3 is the first production car made of the stuff, and while it isn't quite as strong or as light as proper carbon fiber (which requires a huge amount of manual labor to mold and bake), CFRP is still far stronger and lighter than steel, resulting in a fully electric car that weighs just 2,600 pounds -- less than most gasoline-powered cars sold in the US today.



The interior, meanwhile, is riddled with techy bits, including smartphone connectivity and an advanced nav system that can help you find a charger when you're running out of juice. It also offers the sorts of premium driving aids that you'd expect on a premium car, like adaptive cruise control and even a traffic jam assist that enables the car to drive itself at low speeds. It's a machine that feels remarkably free of compromises, a striking contrast to many other contemporary EVs, which make do with limited features and functionality to keep costs down.

A 40-year effort

The i3 is just the first step of BMW i. The company had fiddled with EVs in the past, most notably with the 1602 Electric concept that made an appearance at the opening ceremonies of the 1972 Munich Olympics. That car was a modified version of the company's 1602 coupe, loaded up with simple lead acid batteries to deliver an underwhelming maximum range of 19 miles. It was hardly a vision for the future, as BMW never had any intention of putting it into production.

BMW Project Manager Manuel Sattig
Fast-forward 35 years, to 2007, and BMW is ready to get serious. Manuel Sattig is project manager of Project i.
"The idea behind it was to make the company fit for the future, to see how mobility will change for the future," he said. "For that, a small project called Project i was created. The first name we had for the i3 was the Mega City Vehicle. Most of the individual mobility is going to happen in urbanized areas."
The Mega City Vehicle, or MCV, debuted at the 2012 London Olympics, 40 years after the 1602, and though it would evolve somewhat over the next 12 months, its concept would remain the same. Importantly, this was not just to be a funky little electric car. The i3 was to be the harbinger of a new brand full of fresh ideas that would ultimately percolate through the entire company. "i is still a BMW," Sattig told me, "but it's looking at other forms of mobility and of course sustainability at the core. Both eventually support the entire BMW brand."
That starts with small things for now, like the i3's remarkably thin seats. To save space and weight in the car, the goal was to create something dramatically thinner and lighter than the plush and comfy but bulky and heavy leather-wrapped thrones found in most BMWs. Daniel Starke, head of interior design at BMW i, walked me through the thinking. "We knew we wanted thin seats, because when you open the door you know you didn't want a big chunk of leather....That is better when you sit in the car, more room for your knees. It is better when you get in and out of the car, and they look really cool."


That they do, but they're still very comfortable and, perhaps more importantly, very light. Designers for BMW's other models, themselves on the quest of reducing weight to increase fuel economy, now want these seats in their cars. Starke calls this the "pull effect," with the products in the Project i running ahead and dragging the rest of the company's offerings along.

An interior like a loft apartment

The thin seats help to create an open, roomy feel inside the BMW i3, which is just a foot longer than a Mini. This airy feel is unlike other BMW models on the road, known for their generally sombre, driver-focused cockpits.
Christian Knoll, an interior designer at BMW i, likens the i3's interior to a loft apartment. "The whole car is a change in corporate culture. Moving away from this driver-oriented cockpit to a living room, which is open to all passengers, where the driver is not in a monopoly information position. It is quite radical."
"We wanted to keep the stress out," Starke said. "When you're moving through a mega city it's quite stressful, and we wanted to give that person, a driver, the feeling that he is at home. We wanted to create a roomy and quiet atmosphere."
The architecture of the i3, with a flat floor and an electric motor tucked between the rear wheels, makes that possible. "We had this empty room, because all the technical bits are out of the way," he said. "That gave us a big opportunity to take out the double-DIN that's normally in the center stack, we chucked that under the rear seat."
This means there's no bulky center console, just a lot of room for legs and cubbies for gadgets.

 

Even though that center stack was mostly deleted, its functionality was not. Despite the futuristic look and feel of the car, all of the controls for interacting with the stereo system, navigation, and things like headlights and turn signals, are very traditional. Familiar, even. Knoll, the interior designer, calls this "clever simplicity."
"We know from market research that some people are worried if they have to learn a lot of new things when they drive an electric car. Our aim was to make it as easy and comfortable as possible and also to provide maximum transparency about what the car can do and also what the user can do in order to go beyond these limits."
So, the i3 features a virtually unmodified version of BMW's (now aptly titled) iDrive control system for navigating through system menus. Any BMW owner will feel right at home. Knoll says that you already have to teach EV buyers many new things, like how to charge the car and manage range.
"This already costs attention. If you change too much about what people already know about the vehicle it can be most advanced but not acceptable."
The familiar, then, is as important as the unfamiliar.
Still, the i3 designers opted to make one radical change in the controls of the car: shifting gears. In a traditional, manual car, the shifter is a center-mounted stick that is physically connected to the gearbox. Move the stick and, assuming you depressed the clutch and gave the synchros time to do their thing, the transmission engages the next gear. Automatic transmissions handle the complexities of shifting themselves, but that concept of tilting a stick into D or R continued.


Multiple gears are needed to enable a car to move effectively at low or high speeds, because an internal combustion engine is only truly effective within a narrow range of speeds. Electric motors, with far fewer moving parts, can spin far faster and, crucially, deliver full power at any RPM. Finally, since they can spin just as well in either direction, they don't require a discrete reverse gear. In other words, the idea of shifting is properly obsolete in most EVs.
So, the team decided to exorcise the stick shifter, getting extra motivation by putting a flat, continuous bench seat up front in the early concepts. The idea was that you could slide from the driver's side to the passenger's side, or put a third person in the middle. That concept would ultimately be deleted, as individual adjustments for driver and passenger became difficult, but still the team worked hard on numerous ways to replace the ubiquitous shifter.
"We thought about buttons, but we found that to be really unsexy. It's not an essential feeling....It was too abstract; that's not emotional," Knoll said.
Of the "very many" concepts Knoll said the team evaluated, he settled on a sort of twist-grip that's mounted to the right of the steering wheel. You simply angle it in the direction you want to go. "The semantics tell you cleanly what you need to do: twist forward to drive, twist backward to reverse."
Gas and brake pedals on the floor work like normal, two holdouts from the early days of driving that Knoll and team decided to leave alone -- for now.
New drivers to the i3 will probably be a bit befuddled by this shifting arrangement at first, as indeed I was, but after the first few drive selections it becomes second nature. That said, with the whopping number of other buttons used to control the car's key functionality, another few marked P, R, and D would likely not have had much of an impact on the car's sensuality.

Driving impressions

Tilt the shifter into D and, with a gentle press of the gas pedal, the i3 smoothly accelerates down the road. Like other EVs, the power and throttle response are immediately apparent, but it's far easier to be smooth here than in most. The i3 feels like it's being pulled along by an invisible magnet.


It rolls on impossibly skinny tires that would look perfectly at home on a horse-drawn carriage, 19 inches in diameter but just 6 inches in width. That's 4 inches taller than those found on a Toyota Prius, yet 1.5 inches narrower.
"The tires are specially made for i3," said Michael Lenz, who handles driving dynamics for BMW i. "They have small rolling resistance and, with the rim design, better aerodynamics."
They also help the car to achieve a tight turning radius of 32.3 feet -- a huge help on the narrow and congested streets of Amsterdam, where I tested the car.
Their skinny width necessarily limits grip but not so much that the i3 isn't fun to drive. In fact, it handles remarkably well. The battery packs are mounted low, that 168 hp motor provides its drive to the rear wheels, and I had a blast zipping around in the thing. Unfortunately, though, the nondefeatable traction control will serve as something of an intolerant governor, shutting down power at the slightest hint of wheelspin. I asked Lenz why they didn't add a Sport mode that would allow you to have a little more fun.
"We don't have this," he said. "It should not be a sports mobile. It should be an economic city mobile, but I think in the Comfort mode it is really sporty."

 
 

More models to come

If you're looking for something properly sporty, you'll need to wait for the next car from the group. "i8 is something completely different," said Lenz.
It debuted in 2009 at the Frankfurt auto show as Vehicle Efficient Dynamics concept; it's actually a plug-in hybrid, relying on a three-cylinder turbodiesel engine in the rear paired with an electric motor in the front. The pair of powerplants enable the car to be all-wheel drive and quite fast (accelerating to 60 mph in less than 7 seconds) while delivering nearly 100 mpg.
BMW i Project Manager Sattig said the Vehicle Efficient Dynamics concept was meant to envision a "true sportscar of the future....Reactions we so drastic that it was clear we had to produce the car." And so they did, with an anticipated launch in 2014. It's a very different machine than the i3, says Daniel Starke: "As it is a sports car, it is much more focused on the driver. You sit much lower in the car with the batteries next to you. It's a different layout, but also a purpose-built layout with carbon fiber."

The private information Facebook now makes public

"The social network's recent privacy recalculation prevents excluding your profile picture, cover photo, and other formerly hide-able information from search results. "

You may have been one of the many Facebook users contacted by the company last week about the demise of the "Who can look up your Timeline by name" search setting. The Facebook e-mail announcing the discontinuation of the feature goes on to explain how to limit what information you share on the service. Unfortunately, there's no longer a way to limit globally the personal information Facebook shares with everyone; you can do so only for each separate post using the audience selector.
The Facebook Help Center states the following:
"Your name, gender, username, user ID (account number), profile picture, cover photo and networks (if you choose to add these) are available to anyone since they are essential to helping you connect with your friends and family."
Of particular concern to privacy advocates is the ability of third-party app developers to access your friends list. Last August, CNN's Katie Lobosco reported that at least one financial-lending company uses your Facebook friends list to help determine your creditworthiness.
According to Lobosco, if your friends have a history of late payments, your credit score with the company goes down. (Note that another credit company reduces the score of any applicant whose online form is completed in all caps, or without any caps.)
Prevent Facebook apps from accessing your private data
One of the tips in last September's article about how to secure your Facebook account easily, explains how to put a muzzle on nosy Facebook apps. The simplest way to enhance your Facebook privacy is to delete the apps. Unfortunately, removing an app doesn't delete the information the developer has already collected about you.
As the Facebook Help Center's App Privacy Settings page describes, you have to contact the developer directly using Facebook's Report a Problem feature. The page states that not all apps provide a way to contact the developer.
Facebook users are installing apps from developers who help themselves to the users' private information without offering a clear mechanism for retrieving the data. Users have no way of knowing what the information includes or how it will be used, let alone whether it is accurate. Nope, no privacy risk there.
The Facebook App Settings page lets you control the information about you that friends can share when they use apps. You can uncheck any or all of the 17 categories of information presented.

Facebook App Settings option for friends sharing your information with apps 
 
Uncheck the categories of personal information you don't want your friends to be able to share with the Facebook apps they use.
 
 
The App Settings page indicates that you can prevent apps and Web sites from accessing other categories of information by "turning off all Platform apps." To do so, click Edit to the right of "Apps you use" on the App Settings page, and click the Turn Off Platform button.
Privacy promises to European users come up empty
Imagine if Facebook, Google, and other services had to notify you of the information they collect about you, how the companies will use the information, the third parties they will share the information with, and how you can restrict use and disclosure of the information.
Now imagine you're given the ability to opt out of the collection and use of your information beyond what is necessary to transact your business with the companies. Even better, imagine having to opt in to the use of your personal information in any way other than the original purpose for which you supplied the information.
These are two of the seven Safe Harbor Privacy Principles that US companies agree to comply with for their customers residing in European Union countries. Export.gov provides an overview of the Safe Harbor requirements. The principles specify that individuals be afforded access to the personal information the companies collect about them and be able to correct, amend, or delete the information.
As Politico's Erin Mershon points out, the Safe Harbor Framework is intended to allow US companies to comply with the EU's stringent privacy regulations. The rules have been a sticking point in light of the National Security Agency's widespread surveillance. Some Europeans believe US firms use the Safe Harbor Framework to avoid complying with the EU's privacy requirements.
While Federal Trade Commission Commissioner Julie Brill defends the Safe Harbor Framework, EU officials point out the lack of enforcement efforts by the FTC. Safe Harbor guidelines rely on companies self-certifying, so to a great extent the framework operates on the honor system.
At a meeting last month of the European Parliament's Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee, an executive at Galexia, an Australian management consulting firm that researches Safe Harbor compliance, highlighted the program's lax enforcement. According to InfoSecurity, Galexia's Chris Connolly told the committee that 427 US companies make false claims about their Safe Harbor compliance.
A more-widespread compliance shortcoming relates to the Safe Harbor regulations' dispute-resolution requirements. Connolly testified that about 30 percent of the 3,000 self-certifying organizations offer no dispute-resolution options, and a large number of those companies that claim to provide dispute resolution, instead refer customers to the American Arbitration Association, which charges complainants from $120 to $1,200 per hour, with a minimum of 4 hours, on top of a $950 administration fee.
Some EU officials are calling for the cancellation of the Safe Harbor program, which has been in place for 13 years. Viviane Reding, vice president of the European Commission and EU justice commissioner, spoke at a seminar in Washington, D.C., late last month and recommended the only way for the US to restore Europe's trust is to enact privacy legislation that provides EU citizens with a right of redress when their privacy is violated, as Bloomberg BNA's Stephen Gardner reported last week.
Sounds like a law US citizens could benefit from as well. In the absence of such protections, Facebook needs to follow Google's lead with Gmail and admit, once and for all, that users have no expectation of privacy when using the social network.

This story has been corrected to state that you can limit Facebook sharing on a per-post basis via the Facebook audience selector. It has also been updated to remove details about a previous EPIC complaint to the FTC about a previous Facebook policy.

Parkopedia will make it easier to park your Volvo



2013 Volvo XC60 
 Volvo cars will soon feature the ability to search for available parking spaces and lots with Parkopedia app integration.
 
LOS ANGELES -- Parkopedia is to parking what Inrix is to traffic. The service helps drivers to find and navigate to parking, provides live space availability and pricing via an app or the web, and has just announced that it has been selected to provide in-dash parking information for Volvo's global automotive offerings.

Parkopedia icon  
(Credit: Parkopedia) 
 
Not a lot of information was given about the nuts and bolts of the Parkopedia integration in the announcement, but, earlier this year, we saw Volvo announce it would be offering its new Sensus Connected Touch interface in upcoming vehicles. This Android-powered infotainment system is based on the Parrot Asteroid platform, and makes use of the third-party Asteroid Market filled with car-centric Android apps. Parkopedia has been available in this market for aftermarket Asteroid receivers for some time now, so my guess is that Volvo users will gain access to Parkopedia's detailed information on over 28 million parking spaces in 40 countries by installing a version of the app on their Connected Touch receiver via this method.
Parkopedia also doesn't mention availability for this Volvo integration, but the Connected Touch system is already available for current Volvo models, and as far back as the 2011 model year, so we could be seeing parking data in Volvo dashboards very soon.

Add-on module auto-unlocks your car when your phone is near




Bluetooth Keyless Entry module 
 
LOS ANGELES -- For some time now, we've been anticipating the day that you'd be able to unlock your car by simply approaching it with your smartphone in your pocket. It turns out that the technology has been right under our noses.
The first generation of the Mobile Enhancement Specialist's (MES) Bluetooth Passive Keyless Entry module hit the market earlier this year and, after being professionally installed in almost any car with power locks, can automatically unlock the vehicle's doors when it recognizes your Bluetooth-enabled cellphone is within range. The phone doesn't even have to leave the driver's pocket; no button presses are required. As you leave the vehicle and exit the effective Bluetooth range, the car will automatically lock itself. According to MES, the module should work with any Bluetooth phone -- even my dad's Moto RAZR flip phone.
This week at the LA Auto Show, we learned about the second generation of this technology -- the Premium Bluetooth Passive Keyless Entry module -- boasting increased security.

 Premium Bluetooth Keyless Entry app/iOS 

The Premium Bluetooth Keyless Entry app gives the module 128-bit encrypted security and gives the owner control over its behavior.

Where the original module worked by recognizing your phone's MAC address -- which could potentially be spoofed by tech-savvy ne'er-do-wells -- this new Premium module uses a companion app that is installed on your iOS device (requires iPhone4S and newer) or Android device (requires Bluetooth Smart Ready device running Android 4.3+) and 128-bit encryption to increase security. The app runs in the background on the smartphone and handles the negotiation of the door locking and unlocking, giving the owner notifications of the vehicle's lock state. The Premium version also uses Bluetooth Low Energy to reduce battery drain on your smartphone.
However, by increasing security and requiring an iOS or Android app, the Premium module loses "works with every Bluetooth phone" claim of the first generation, but that's a security trade off that I'd be willing to make. And unlike a telematics-based unlocking service like OnStar, the Bluetooth Passive Keyless Entry module handles all of the unlocking locally, without the need for a data connection, so there's no subscription fee to worry about.
You should also keep in mind that you'll still need your car's key on hand with both the Standard and Premium modules to start the engine -- the Bluetooth module will only unlock the doors -- and to get into your car in the event that your phone's battery dies. This isn't exactly a perfect keyless solution. OEM smart keyless entry and start systems are still a more elegant solution, but you can't easily add an OEM systems to your '96 Honda Civic. The Bluetooth Keyless Entry module sort of bridges that convenience-compatibility gap.
The Premium version of the module will ship starting in December 2013 with iPhone/iOS compatibility out of the box for $189.99. The release of the Android version of the Bluetooth Passive Keyless Entry app and compatibility will follow shortly. The original module is available now and will continue to be available for $149.

Wednesday addams series Wednesday in short

 Follow this link to watch the Wednesday Netflix series summaru fully explained-  https://youtu.be/c13Y4XLs_AY